3D television technology is still relatively new, so it is not surprising that most consumers (and many reviewers) are still trying to sort through all of the manufacturer's claims, understand what they mean and what they should do next. There are contradictory and unfounded statements about 3D television technologies that are harrassingly made, as in the classic tale of The Emperor's New Clothes. The purpose of this article is to provide detailed objective test results that will allow you to decide what is really there or not. But the most important question is whether any of these technologies are able to provide a pleasant and convincing 3D visualization experience - we will answer them below, but first we will back it up with a lot of objective evidence.
There are a number of very interesting (and often misunderstood) 3D imaging and visualization issues that need to be addressed for these two 3D television technologies in order to correct incorrect and confusing information about them. This article will provide an objective and in-depth analysis of both 3D technologies. We have a lot of measurement data, which provides a lot of objective evidence, but the most interesting and important part of the 3D evaluation is the 3D imaging and visualization itself, and that only happens inside the brain, so the instruments can not help in this part of the evaluation. We used a lot of high quality 3D content, including 3D movies, photos, images and test patterns. We will describe a series of quantifiable 3D visual tests that anyone can duplicate to verify our findings and conclusions on 3D TV imaging.
Highlights and Summary of Results
This Highlights section contains a summary of the most important results of the Shoot-Out of 3D TV display technology. All details, including measurements and analysis, are documented in the sections dedicated to each topic. If you're new to 3D, do not forget to read our Overview of 3D Vision and Technology and our overview of 3D Glasses.
No comments:
Post a Comment